Visit Website →
← Back to blog

6 Defenses California Lawyers Use to Defeat Attempted Murder Charges

September 17, 2026
6 Defenses California Lawyers Use to Defeat Attempted Murder Charges

Prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you specifically intended to kill and took a direct step toward doing it. Fail on either element and attempted murder cannot stand. The strongest attempted murder defenses in California typically attack that intent element head on, invoke self-defense or imperfect self-defense, or expose procedural defects like illegal searches, and the earliest pretrial moves often decide which path a case takes.

TL;DR:

  • Proving attempted murder requires demonstrating both specific intent to kill and a direct step towards committing the act, with circumstantial evidence often key.
  • Penalties vary sharply: second-degree attempts typically result in 5 to 9 years, while first-degree attempts can lead to life imprisonment, especially with aggravating factors like guns or prior strikes.
  • Defenses most often contest intent, the presence of a direct step, or invoke self-defense, imperfect self-defense, or procedural issues to challenge the case.
  • Jury instructions on self-defense and heat of passion are crucial, and courts must give them when supported by evidence, with failure to do so grounds for appeal.
  • Pretrial motions, early investigation, suppression of unconstitutional evidence, and strategic plea negotiations can significantly influence the case outcome.
Rubinlawpc
Protect Your Rights After Serious Charges
Rubin Law provides strategic criminal defense for serious charges, including constitutional challenges and focused representation in Los Angeles courts.
Visit Rubin Law

Table of Contents

What Do Penal Code §§ 664 and 187 Actually Require?

Penal Code § 664 sets the punishment structure for criminal attempts in California, and it works hand in hand with Penal Code § 187, which defines murder itself. Together they force prosecutors to prove two separate things, not one blended concept.

Two separate legal proof elements converging

The first is specific intent to kill. This is a higher bar than intent to injure, intent to scare, or even intent to seriously harm someone. Reckless conduct, no matter how dangerous, does not automatically translate into an intent to kill. The second element is a direct step: an act that goes beyond mere planning and moves toward actually committing the killing.

The distinction plays out constantly in real cases. Buying a weapon, researching a target's schedule, or driving toward someone's house are usually preparation. Pulling a trigger, lunging with a knife, or forcing a car off the road toward a pedestrian are direct steps. Because almost nobody announces "I intend to kill you" before acting, prosecutors lean heavily on circumstantial evidence:

  • Statements made before or during the incident, including threats or arguments
  • The type of weapon used and how it was deployed
  • The location and number of wounds, if any
  • Prior conflicts or relationship history between the parties
  • Conduct immediately after the incident, such as fleeing or attempting to help the victim

That last point cuts both ways. Someone who calls 911 immediately after a violent confrontation is telling a very different story than someone who flees the state, and defense counsel at Rubin Law, P.C. uses that kind of post incident conduct to challenge the intent narrative from day one.

How Severe Are the Penalties for Attempted Murder in California?

Sentencing exposure splits sharply depending on whether the prosecution proves premeditation. Second-degree, or non-premeditated, attempted murder generally carries a range of roughly 5, 7, or 9 years in state prison. First-degree attempted murder, meaning the prosecution proves willful, deliberate, and premeditated intent to kill, exposes a defendant to life in prison with the possibility of parole.

Statistic Callout: The gap between second-degree and first-degree attempted murder is not incremental. It is the difference between a fixed number of years and a life sentence, which is why disputing premeditation is often as important as disputing intent itself.

Several factors push exposure even higher:

  • Firearm use enhancements under Penal Code § 12022.53 can add significant additional years to life depending on circumstances
  • Enhanced penalties when the alleged victim is a peace officer performing official duties
  • Prior strike convictions under California's Three Strikes law, which can double a sentence or trigger a 25 years to life term on a third strike

Beyond prison time, a conviction carries collateral consequences that outlast the sentence itself. Non citizens face near certain deportation and inadmissibility. Professional licenses in fields like healthcare, law, real estate, and education can be suspended or revoked. Firearm rights are permanently lost. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation oversees the custody side, but the employment and immigration fallout often follows people for the rest of their lives.

What Are the Best Defenses for Attempted Murder Charges?

Every case is different, but most successful defenses fall into a handful of categories, and the right one depends entirely on the facts.

  1. Lack of specific intent to kill. If the evidence shows intent to injure, frighten, or act recklessly rather than kill, that gap can defeat the charge entirely. Defense counsel often builds this by showing the weapon choice, the manner of attack, or the defendant's own statements point to something short of a kill intent.
  2. No direct step. If the conduct amounts to planning, preparation, or mere presence at a scene, it may not legally qualify as an attempt at all, regardless of what the person may have been thinking.
  3. Self-defense. Under California's self-defense rules, a person who reasonably believed they faced imminent danger, reasonably believed force was necessary, and used no more force than reasonably necessary has a complete legal justification. California has no formal stand-your-ground statute, but jury instructions remove any duty to retreat, which matters enormously when prosecutors argue the defendant "could have walked away."
  4. Imperfect self-defense or heat of passion. When the belief in danger was genuine but not objectively reasonable, or when the defendant acted in the heat of a sudden, provocation driven passion, the law does not excuse the conduct but often reduces it, typically to attempted voluntary manslaughter rather than attempted murder.
  5. Misidentification or false accusation. Alibi evidence, impeachment of eyewitness credibility, and forensic evidence that contradicts the prosecution's timeline can unravel a case built on shaky identification.
  6. Intoxication, duress, and abandonment. These play narrower roles. Voluntary intoxication can sometimes negate specific intent but rarely provides a full defense. Duress requires proof of an immediate threat of death or serious harm compelling the conduct. Abandonment applies only when someone freely and voluntarily withdraws from the plan before completing a direct step, which is a difficult but real possibility in conspiracy-adjacent scenarios.

Pro Tip: Perfect self-defense and imperfect self-defense sound similar but produce wildly different outcomes. One results in acquittal. The other results in a conviction on a lesser charge. The evidence that separates them, like prior threats from the alleged victim or a documented history of violence, needs to surface long before trial, not during it.

Why Do CALCRIM Jury Instructions Matter So Much?

Jury instructions are not a formality. California's CALCRIM guidance covers self-defense, imperfect self-defense, and attempted voluntary manslaughter with specific language juries must follow when deciding guilt.

Judges have a sua sponte duty, meaning an automatic obligation, to give these instructions whenever substantial evidence supports them, even if the defense does not formally request it. Courts have relied on antecedent threats, a history of prior assaults, and witness credibility issues to justify giving these instructions.

  • A missing self-defense or heat of passion instruction, where evidence supported it, is often grounds for appeal
  • Prior threats or violence by the alleged victim can trigger a duty to instruct on self-defense
  • Written requests for specific instructions preserve the issue for appellate review far better than a verbal request

What Pretrial Moves Change the Outcome of an Attempted Murder Case?

Most attempted murder cases are shaped long before a jury is seated. The preliminary hearing is the first real test, where the defense can challenge whether probable cause exists and lock witnesses into testimony that can later be used for impeachment if their story shifts.

  1. Preliminary hearing strategy. Cross-examining the prosecution's witnesses early exposes inconsistencies while memories are still fresh enough to matter and creates a paper trail for trial.
  2. Suppression motions. If evidence, including weapons, statements, or search results, came from an unconstitutional stop or search, a suppression motion can remove that evidence from the case entirely.
  3. Brady motions and discovery demands. Prosecutors must turn over evidence favorable to the defense, including inconsistent witness statements or impeachment material on law enforcement officers.
  4. Severance motions. In multi-defendant cases, severing trials can prevent a jury from associating one defendant with another's more damaging conduct.
  5. Independent investigation. Building alternate timelines, retaining forensic and ballistics experts, and verifying alibi witnesses before the prosecution locks in its theory of the case.

Pro Tip: The preliminary hearing transcript becomes a permanent record. If a witness changes their story between the preliminary hearing and trial, that transcript is the single most useful tool for cross-examination.

Can Attempted Murder Charges Be Reduced Through a Plea?

Reduction is realistic in a meaningful share of cases, particularly where intent evidence is contested or where mitigating circumstances exist. The most common lesser included offense is attempted voluntary manslaughter, which applies when heat of passion or imperfect self-defense evidence is strong enough to undercut a straight murder theory. Assault with a deadly weapon is another frequent landing spot when the direct step evidence is present but intent to kill is genuinely disputed.

  • Prosecutors typically want a guilty plea to a specific reduced charge, sometimes paired with a stipulated sentence, in exchange for dropping the attempted murder count
  • Strong mitigation, such as no prior record, provocation by the alleged victim, or a documented mental health condition, gives defense counsel leverage in these negotiations
  • Appellate cases like People v. Millbrook show that when trial courts fail to instruct juries on attempted voluntary manslaughter despite supporting evidence, convictions can be reversed, which is precisely why building that evidentiary record early carries so much weight in plea talks too

Rubin Law's Perspective on Fighting Attempted Murder Charges

Frequent courtroom appearances across Los Angeles County teach you which arguments actually move a judge and which ones just sound good on paper. Some defense firms prioritize constitutional challenges and targeted discovery specifically because intent is the element prosecutors struggle hardest to prove with direct evidence. Personalized mitigation planning starts immediately, not after a plea deadline forces it.

— Jake

Talk to Rubin Law About Your Attempted Murder Case

Rubin Law, P.C. built its approach around a simple fact: attempted murder cases are usually won or lost in the weeks after arrest, not the weeks before trial. Frequent courtroom appearances in the locale help firms learn which judges scrutinize search warrants closely, which prosecutors will negotiate early, and which motions actually get filed rather than just discussed.

Rubinlawpc

If you or someone you know has been charged, an immediate consultation matters. Bring the charging documents, any discovery already provided, bail paperwork, and contact information for any witnesses who can support your version of events. From there, typical first steps include signing a retainer, launching an independent investigation before evidence disappears or memories fade, and filing early motions that can suppress evidence or challenge probable cause. Visit the Rubin Law criminal defense page to request a consultation and start building your defense while the record is still fresh.

This article is general information, not a substitute for advice from a qualified lawyer. Consult a qualified legal professional about your own circumstances before acting on anything here.

Sources

FAQ

What Is the Average Sentence for Attempted Murder in California?

Non-premeditated attempted murder generally carries 5, 7, or 9 years in state prison, while premeditated attempted murder carries life with the possibility of parole. Firearm and prior strike enhancements can add substantial additional years to either range.

What Is the Penalty for Attempted Murder in California?

The penalty depends entirely on whether the prosecution proves premeditation. Second-degree attempted murder is a determinate term, while first-degree attempted murder exposes a defendant to a life sentence with parole eligibility.

Why Is Attempted Murder Sometimes Treated as a Lesser Charge?

Attempted murder can be reduced to attempted voluntary manslaughter when evidence supports heat of passion or imperfect self-defense, since the law recognizes a genuine but unreasonable belief in danger as a mitigating factor rather than a complete excuse.

Does Attempted Murder Have a Statute of Limitations in California?

Attempted murder has no statute of limitations in California, meaning prosecutors can file charges at any point after the alleged offense regardless of how much time has passed.

How Can an Attorney Help Fight an Attempted Murder Charge?

An experienced defense attorney challenges the prosecution's intent evidence, files suppression and discovery motions, and builds mitigation early. Firms like Rubin Law, P.C. focus on constitutional challenges and independent investigation from the earliest stages of a case.